When it comes to purchasing a new mountain bike you'll have to make the decision of whether to get a 26er or 29er. Although aesthetically a 29er mountain bike is obviously bigger, there are also practical differences between the two bikes meaning you'll want to make an informed decision when shelling out the cash. The following are a few of the main advantages and disadvantages of opting for a 29er.
The immediate difference between the 29er and the 26er mountain bike is obviously its size. The slightly bigger wheels mean that the frame is also bigger, which has proved popular with taller riders who may feel claustrophobic riding the traditional 26er mountain bike. However, the slightly larger wheel size also produces more differences between the bikes.
A con of the 29er mountain bike is that its acceleration cannot rival that of the 26er. However, while you might be left in the dirt at the beginning of a race, once you do reach a higher speed you'll find it much easier to maintain that speed. That's because the larger rim of the wheel provides more traction, allowing you to make sharp turns at high speeds.
The fact that you'll have a less bumpy ride when travelling over overgrown tree roots and rocks means you'll be much more stable and confident that you can keep to high speeds. It's also widely regarded that you've got a much lower chance of flying off a 29er than a 26er, which has to be regarded as a pro.
Many people who are overly critical may not have tried a 29er mountain bike since the early years of its development where problems with acceleration and weight were much more pronounced than they are today. While there are still obviously drawbacks to a 29er mountain bike, more and more people are coming to appreciate that the benefits of this type of bike easily outweigh them.
The immediate difference between the 29er and the 26er mountain bike is obviously its size. The slightly bigger wheels mean that the frame is also bigger, which has proved popular with taller riders who may feel claustrophobic riding the traditional 26er mountain bike. However, the slightly larger wheel size also produces more differences between the bikes.
A con of the 29er mountain bike is that its acceleration cannot rival that of the 26er. However, while you might be left in the dirt at the beginning of a race, once you do reach a higher speed you'll find it much easier to maintain that speed. That's because the larger rim of the wheel provides more traction, allowing you to make sharp turns at high speeds.
The fact that you'll have a less bumpy ride when travelling over overgrown tree roots and rocks means you'll be much more stable and confident that you can keep to high speeds. It's also widely regarded that you've got a much lower chance of flying off a 29er than a 26er, which has to be regarded as a pro.
Many people who are overly critical may not have tried a 29er mountain bike since the early years of its development where problems with acceleration and weight were much more pronounced than they are today. While there are still obviously drawbacks to a 29er mountain bike, more and more people are coming to appreciate that the benefits of this type of bike easily outweigh them.
No comments:
Post a Comment